Every month, the journalists of both Sporza and VRT NWS publish thousands of articles. These articles
differ from each other greatly in many ways. For example, the articles are not always about the same topic,
they can be about sports, entertainment, politics, or even about the weather. The articles are also not always
written by the same journalist, and the length of the articles can be greatly different. It would be useful
therefore; if we had a way of knowing what kind of pageviews and lifecycle we would get from the articles;
before we published them.
The moment a journalist is publishing an article, it is useful to know how the article will perform,
so that both the recommendation engine has extra input to work with as a reference, and the journalist
can make the most of the article concerning updates & follow-up. They will for example invest more time in
providing updates for an article with a very high expected number of views. And they could for example decide to
include or not include a video in the article depending on the predictions made before publishing.
The redaction teams at VRT NWS and Sporza also have control over the contents of the home page, and it is possible that
if they feel that the homepage layout decisions will be influenced by the number of expected pageviews and duration
of people reading it. It could therefore be useful to have a way of knowing what articles will be performing like, so
that they have an extra metric of deciding what to include or not.
There has not been much research into the influencers of pageviews and the article lifecycle yet, and the people working
with this data are geniunly curious as to what things impact views and lifecycles of articles in what ways. It is therefore
a plus if they can get more insight into this data, because the things they learn from it can be applied to various
future projects which lean in the direction of improving the user experience and recommending the right articles at the right time.